Something
that rather surprised me when I found out about it (a small mirandum)
was that the Ordinariate's 'Anglican Patrimony' includes, of all
things, the Carol Service. Setting aside whether something of such
comparatively recent invention can truly be called 'patrimony', my
first thought was to ask why on earth anyone would want to burden
themselves with the wretched thing. One of the benefits from making
one's submission to Rome would surely be that one had at last escaped
this annual blight.
Now,
we have to distinguish between carol services and
carol concerts. I have
no objection to carol concerts, because they make no pretence to
being an act of worship and if you don't want to go, you just don't
buy a ticket. The carol service has all the trappings of a church
service, often in spades, but how far it is truly an act of worship
is disputable. Throughout a lifetime of school-mastering I have
attended several carol services each December and arranged not a few,
but the question I am always left asking is, 'What are they for?'
They
are not sacramental; they are not part of the Divine Office, nor a
substitute for it (though I remember from years ago an elderly priest
sitting in choir and quietly getting on with Evensong by himself
while a carol service raged around him); they are not in any
noticeable way an act of preparation for Christmass, which would
presumably be of a penitential character; though there are Bible
readings, it scarcely qualifies as lectio divina.
What they do seem to be, to my mind, are occasions of sentimental
narcissism, frequently with a large dose of ungodly pride, where God
barely gets a look-in.
Let's
examine some carol services more closely. First off is the primary
school carol service, aka Worshipping the Infant King. Unfortunately
it is not Jesus who is worshipped but the offspring of filiolatrous
parents, who have come to adore little Kaitlyn and Calum being so
sweet in 'We Will Rock You'. The programme will be firmly in the
hands of the teachers, so any serious catechesis of the children is
right off the agenda; in fact, straightforward readings from the
Bible probably discriminate against the dyslexic ('Jade cried all
evening when she knew she wasn't reading again this year ...') so you
are as likely to have a playlet about the Littlest Donkey as you are
to get Luke chapter 2. This is church as an extension of Mumsnet.
Eventually
the children leave primary school, and you move on to the
Rutterfest. This is the usual
form in secondary schools with any pretence at having a choir, and in
many parish churches as well. The standard of performance will be as
good as can be managed, so it is something of a shame that so much
effort is expended on material that is, frankly, appalling. The great
exponent of this genre, of course, is John Rutter, of whom the
composer David Arditti has commented:
Rutter ... is ... hard to take
seriously, because of the way in which his sheer technical facility
or versatility leads to a superficial, unstable crossover style which
is neither quite classical not pop, and which tends towards mawkish
sentimentality in his sugarily-harmonised and orchestrated melodies
[in
New Composers of Tonal Classical Music].
I couldn't put it better myself, except to add that Rutter, who has
gone on record as saying that he is 'not particularly religious',
frequently writes his own lyrics which are frequently characterised
by jejune rhymes, devoid of theological content, and unbearably twee.
Rutter is not alone in apparently believing that the message of
Christmass is a big warm feeling with no real religious meaning. The
very cosy nature of this sort of carol service, which makes no
demands and poses no challenges to the listener, is, of course the
reason for the popularity of the genre. Many will say, 'At least it
gets people into church,' but this simply provokes the question, 'To
what end?' The programme of readings, usually with no explanations
given, will mean little or nothing to people whose knowledge of the
Bible is hazy or non-existent (how many people for whom this is their
one visit to church in the year could say what the first reading from
Genesis ch. 3 has to do with Christmass?)
The
other sort of carol service is, of course, the Elite or Very Superior
model.
Usually found in the chapels of grander institutions of higher
education and in suburban parish churches of a certain social
homogeneity, the Very Superior Carol Service boasts a professional or
semi-professional choir, augmented as likely as not by a consort of
viols and the odd crumhorn player, performing 14th
century Savoyard villanelles in the original dialect.
The pattern of
the service will be strictly according to King's, with its unctuous
prose from Eric Milner-White ('.. be it our care and delight this
Christmastide … in heart and mind to go even unto Bethlehem …'
and all the rest of it), and is unlikely to come in at under an hour
and a half. When it is over, refreshments will be served – no
Tesco's ready-mixed mulled wine here, but more likely a recreation
of a recipe for possett Jeremy found in Harleian MSS 370 when
researching the screenplay for his documentary on Odo the Contagious.
The whole accent is on showing off,
and the fact that it takes place in a sacred building and might have
a sacred purpose tends to pass most participants by.
'consort of viols ...' |
'the odd crumhorn player' |
Well,
of course I am guying the whole business – but can you put your
hand on your heart and say you have never been to a carol service
like one of these? The Ordinariate is welcome to take it with them,
but I do not see in the carol service anything approaching a Catholic
spirituality – tacking Benediction on to the end simply underlines
the barrenness of what is on offer. Meanwhile, no longer being in the
scholastic trade, I shall make it my
care and
delight to keep well away from carols until Midnight Mass itself.
And
a merry ding-ding-a-bloody-dong to you all.